Bolton Data for Inclusion
The
Action Research Centre for Inclusion
(Sponsored
by: The Barrow Cadbury Trust)
at
Bolton Institute of Higher Education.
Data No 15 :
July 1997
Author(s) :
Margaret R Lea
Title :
Growing up and living with the stigma of epilepsy
Abstract :
This essay is written in the first person because it is autobiographical. It is, in parts, from a child’s view, growing up and living with the stigma of epilepsy. It details some of the incidents in a 35 year history of discrimination and a life, paradoxically enriched by that discrimination. The part played in labelling by allopathic medicine and the decision to believe that doctors, for all their wisdom and understanding about the human condition, do not know what is best for one individual.
When I was twelve years old, I remember sitting in
front of the television and watching a war-time film about Army personnel
parachuting into occupied territory. I
remember watching them falling through the sky, on the screen and suddenly I was
falling with them into oblivion. That
was the first of many grand mal seizures. My general practitioner sent me to the local hospital where
an electro encephalogram (EEG) confirmed the diagnosis of left temporal lobe
epilepsy. Epilepsy is caused by
electrical stimulation of neurones firing in the brain.
Normally, a chemical "wall" holds back the firing mechanisms,
in epilepsy, this wall is breached and the subsequent excessive, synchronised
activity causes fits or seizures. These
fits or seizures are called grand mal. A
secondary symptom is petite mal, in which, ones attention is totally lost and it
seems as if some time has elapsed since one was last aware of conversation or
happenings, (sometimes called absences).
The doctor gave my mother some tablets which I had to take and told me that I
would have to take these for the rest of my life.
I, at this stage of the game, did not understand how this was to shape my
future.
A few weeks later, I called next door but one for my friend Ruth, we had grown
up together and we were in the same class at primary and junior school.
I knocked on Mrs Smalley's door. When
she opened it, I said "is Ruth coming out to play Mrs Smalley?"
She replied "She's not playing with you any more you're a
lunatic!" Stupidly, I asked
"What's a lunatic?" she
said "You are! You've got something wrong with your brain and I don't want
Ruth catching it!".
This was the first of many times during the course of my life that I
realised I was different from the "norm".
|
"The term "defectives" was used to describe people with sensory impairments such as blindness, deafness and the lack of speech. After 1903 people with epilepsy and children termed "mentally subnormal" were also added to this category." (Barnes, 1991, p.18) |
However, after one pretty hard homework session, a girl called Jennifer who sat in front of me asked if she could copy my homework as she hadn't done hers. I told her that it would probably be wrong, but never the less, she copied it into her book. Our books were taken in for marking and the following day, Mr. Cheshire asked me why I hadn't done my homework myself, but copied it off Jennifer. I told him that I had done my homework. At break, the discussion between myself and Jennifer escalated into a scuffle, I fell against a radiator, banged my head and had a seizure and was taken to hospital. Going back into that classroom was the hardest thing I've ever done in my life. My seizures got worse - there was no way I could have taken my O levels anyway -I believed I wasn't bright enough. So I left school at 15 years of age with no qualifications whatsoever.
| "Institutional
discriminations against disabled people is ingrained throughout the
present education system. The
data shows most of the educational provision for disabled children and
students remains basically segregative, is dominated by traditional
medically-influenced attitudes and commands a low priority within the
education system as a whole."
(Barnes, 1991 p. 28) |
My first job was a junior in a ladies hairstylists.
My parent thought it a good thing for their daughter to learn a
"Profession" and I didn't have the heart to tell them that I was a
cleaner and "go for". One
of my jobs was to clean and sterilise brushes and combs after use.
By this time I wanted to be normal.
So I didn't tell the owners that I had epilepsy when I applied for the
job. I lasted three months!
One of the stylists was rather temperamental, no doubt due to his
creative streak.
He picked up a brush one morning that hadn't been cleaned and enraged,
threw it at me! Yes, it hit me on
the head and I had a seizure and got the sack. The owners said that they couldn't have someone like me
working there ... I would frighten the customers away!
This was when I first encountered the Disablement Resettlement Officer and was
handed a "Green Card" to certify that I wasn't normal and therefore my
contribution to society was limited, but of course, valued non the less.
Another lasting memory is of when I worked at a large
company as a clerk typist. They
were "Doing their bit" by employing disabled people.
I was asked if I'd take over the secretary's job whilst she was away on
sick leave, I agreed and for six months, did her job as well as my own.
When she came back, I was moved to the typing room and told to do the
audio typing for the representatives. Not
qualified or good enough for this job, I was sacked.
It all added to the feeling of inferiority.
| "Society is embarrassed and frightened of those
people who are "Different", those who have physical
disabilities. It's this
unease which makes the employment of a disabled person undesirable as
their disruptive influence on a team at work can endanger the smooth
running and the productivity..”
(Graham et. al. 1990 p. 10 Cited in : Barnes. 1991 p. 78)
"Although this statement refers specifically to "physical disabilities", other students have noted that employers hold similar attitudes towards the employment of people with non-visible impairments such as mental illness
(Dyer, 1990) and epilepsy (IFF Research 1990) (Barnes, 1991 p. 78) |
Life went on and the stress of being different
accumulated. At 20 years of age I
met and married. At 21 I gave birth
to my daughter. At least I think I
did. The great day dawned and
turned into disaster. I had a
succession of grand mal fits and was heavily sedated until the final moments of
her birth. I was told that it
wouldn't be a good idea to have any more children.
Shortly after the birth, my husband left for good.
We divorced some 2 years later, with my husband claiming in court, that I
hadn't told him I was an epileptic... as if such a thing could be hidden.
The next recountable incident took place in the late 1970's.
By this time, I had met a wonderful man who had children of his own and
our family now numbered three. On a
visit to my GP he informed me that the cost of the drugs I was taking was
excessive and wanted to change the epanutin to phenytoin sodium.
I didn't understand, but he was the doctor and off I duly went,
prescription in hand. Some six
months later, I woke up one morning to find that I couldn't walk and that I had
spastic movement in my left arm. I
couldn't see very well either. My
husband called the doctor and I was subsequently hospitalised for two months. I had what was called, by the doctor, an incompatibility with
phenytoin sodium. The drug was, at
that time, made into tablet form and although each was roughly a certain dose,
it could be as much as twice the normal dosage in one tablet.
The cost of phenytoin sodium however, was negligible in comparison to
other measured dose anti-convulsant. I
recovered, but if under any extreme stress, I sometimes find that I have some
spastic movement in my left arm.
During the 1980's the dangers of tranquillisers was
reported in the media. By this
time, the medical profession had, in it's infinite wisdom declared that the
electrical activity in my brain required even greater sedation and, for a period
of fifteen years, I took Librium, Valium, Pheno-barbitone and epanutin three
times a day. I wanted to live.
So I decided not to take any more Librium or Valium.
I remember my body wanting tablets.
The longing to "pop a pill" was so great. So, I bought a tube
of smarties and every time I felt I needed a pill, I took one.
It worked for me. My GP
struck me off his list when I told him. He
said that he didn't want to look after someone who thought they knew better than
him, he called me a difficult patient. He
retired soon after and I was taken on by a younger group practice.
| "Harris used functional assessments of
disability based on a threefold distinction between impairment, disability
and handicap...This approach remains close to medical classification of
disease. It conserves the
notion of impairment as abnormality in function, disability as not being
able to perform an activity considered normal for a human being, and
handicap as the inability to perform a "normal" social
role.
(Oliver, 1990 Cited in Barnes 1991. p. 24). |
In 1990, I read a book about
disease. For the life of me, I
can't remember what it is called or it's author.
It said that disease occurred when the mind was unhappy and the
subsequent disease that it felt was displayed as illness. To a greater degree I
realised that this, certainly in my own case, was true, but decided not to do
anything about it for the time being. For
the next six months, doing as the book suggested, I thought about WHY I was
epileptic and how it had shaped my life.
In some respects, I really didn't need it and in
others, depended upon it for my identity.
| "In other words, identity is
not something "given" but it is bestowed in acts of social
recognition. We become that
as which we are addressed".
(Berger, 1978 p. 117). |
Reading another book, I read of the text above the Oracle at Delphi, which is purported to have read, "Man, Know Thyself". So this woman set about searching for me. There were things I wanted and things I didn't want. One of the things I didn't need any longer was a label. The only way I could get rid of that item after so long was to prove to myself that I did not require a label in the first instance.
| "Since every individual is confronted
with essentially the same institutional programme for this life in the
society, the total force of the institutional order is brought to bear
with more or less equal weight on each individual, producing compelling
masivity for the objective reality to be internalised."
(Berger & Luckmann, 1996 p. 193) |
In my infinite wisdom and, on telling my husband of the decision and his utter incredulity was that I could be so foolish. I decided not to take any more tablets for my epilepsy. Instead I tried visualising my head wrapped in a blue turban three times a day. The turban was secure and neat, with no pieces sticking out. So in June 1991 I at long last became a non-labelled being. Three months later when I picked up enough courage to talk to my GP about this, he really wasn't pleased.
| "Traditional explanations of disabled
peoples individual and collective disadvantage rest upon the assumptions
of the "medical model" of disability".
This approach maintains that impairment has such a traumatic
physical and/or psychological
impact upon individuals that they are unable to achieve a reasonable
quality of life by their own efforts.
(Barnes, 1994, p. ix) |
I suddenly realised that in this game, doctors need
people to be ill, or at least believe that they are ill, otherwise they would
lose their reason d'etre. In the
social games we play, we need others to be colluded.
If there were no wars, there would be no reason for people to be brave.
If no one committed any crime, there would be no need for policemen.
If there were none to learn, there would be no reason for someone to
teach. And so it goes on.
We all need others to help us play our games.
I can't tell you it was easy, it wasn't. At
times there was someone hammering baking trays inside my skull with a
sledgehammer...or at least, that's how it felt.
But gradually, with the visualisation, my life came into focus.
Who I was became an issue, before this time, others met my epilepsy first
and myself second. What I wanted
for me and for me to achieve to feel fulfilled also became an issue.
By this time, the children had left home.
I hadn't worked for some time. My
last job was as a self-employed market trader, which I had to give up because of
the epilepsy. By 1992, I realised
that I could only continue the search for me alone.
My GP recommended counselling. This
brought it's own realisation. The
main one being that I loved my husband very much, but I was no longer in love
with him.
That there was no room in the relationship for me to be who I really was.
So with his help, I left. I
acquired a one bedroom flat and called that my "Womb with a view". I took nothing save a bed-settee and a standard lamp.
With the grand sum of £50 in the bank, I began the search to find me.
During 1993, I was depressed and a visit to my GP resulted in a course of
Prozac. You would really think that
by this stage I would have known better, but no.
Two weeks later, whilst shopping with a friend, I had another grand mal
seizure. This was a direct result
of taking Prozac. I learned that my body cannot now tolerate drugs of any kind.
Shortly after this episode, I contracted pneumonia and had to call my GP
and ask for a home visit. When he
eventually arrived and made a diagnosis, he commented that all of us need
doctors at some time and shouldn't alienate them.
I haven't seen him since. I
try not to go the doctors now unless it's absolutely necessary.
During this period of evaluation, I realised that I did have a mind of my own,
opinions and strong ones at that! I
knew that I would never knowingly hurt anyone.
That basically, I was a good human being, with wants and needs that were
not being fulfilled. I wanted to
prove to myself that I was educable. Not
some thick and stupid dimwit who had no chance.
So I decided to read for a degree. It
was the hardest task that I could think of.
I signed up for a typing and word processing course at a local college.
I passed with distinctions. I
signed up for an access course and gained entry into Bolton Institute in 1995.
A part time job became available in October 1995 and I became the project worker
at an Older peoples venture in the inner city, where I have worked since.
I passed my driving test and I no longer think of myself as a little
women with a label, rather, just me.
I really do try to listen to myself. If
I'm doing something I ask myself, "Is this making me happy?
Is it really what I want to do?"
If the answer is yes, then fine, if not, I do something else.
I, at first wanted to say that this experience was my choice, that I was aware
of choices in my life, but at 12 years of age I had no choice but to let others
who "knew me better" decide for me.
This, for me, is the worst type of oppression.
Society labelled me as a child and then, threw away my right to
individuality at a time when I was unable to have a say in the matter.
Yes, latter in my life I can see that accepting that I had no choice but to take
a course of action was a choice in itself.
This led to my being labelled and excluded.
However, I view this entirely positively.
If this had not happened, I wouldn't be who I am at this moment in time.
I could not begin to understand those who have for some reason been
excluded from society. I work with
older people. I try to ensure that
their needs are met and that ageism or any other "ism" is not applied
to them. We are all unique
individuals with stories to tell of the obstacles that we have overcome in our
lifetime. Every single one of us
has suffered from our humanness. It
is part of the human condition. Yet
from suffering we learn to be individuals.
| During the course of my studies at
Bolton Institute I came across the work of Sociologists such as George
Simmel and Erving Goffman. George
Simmel developed the conception of sociology by applying the distinction
of forms and contents to the social world. "The world consists of
innumerable contents which are given determinate identity, structure and
meaning through the imposition of forms which man has created in the
course of his experience."
(Levine, 1971, p. xxxii) |
Contents in
this particular case are the needs, drives and purposes which lead individuals
to interact; whilst forms are the
process by which, individuals can combine to form unities.
For Simmel, social worlds are created by individuals giving energy to
certain forms. For example, trade
unions, monasticism, banks, institutes of higher education etc.. They are
subjective, and do not really exist except in the energy that we have created
them.
Reading Simmel's interpretation of game play in the
social world made me realise just how much we play games.
How fragile social reality actually is.
Through Goffman's work, I realised the intricate strands of social
behaviour that hold the social world together and how adept we are at game play.
We have intricate body language by which we signal our intent to others.
We also utilise this facility to inform the world of our social identity.
My own observation is that though being disabled, I
appear to be fully able. Not only
to appreciate the game of disability, and a "self" crying out to be
recognised before the label, but to step back and watch other games that are
being played around me. Simmel
worried that there was no room in urban society for individuality. He need not have worried.
It is alive and well as we progress into the second millennium.
BARNES, C. (1994) Disabled People in Britain and Discrimination. London. Hurst & Co.
BERGER, P. (1978) Invitation to Sociology : A Humanistic Perspective. Middlesex. Penguin.
BERGER, P. & LUCKMANN, T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality. Middlesex. Penguin.
DYER, (1990) Cited in : BARNES op. cit. p.78
GOFFMAN, E. (1963) Behaviour in Public Places
GRAHAM et al (1990) Cited in : op. cit. p. 78
IFF RESEARCH (1990) Cited in : op. cit. p. 78
LEVINE, D.N. (1971) (Ed) George Simmel on Individuality and Social Forms University of Chicago Press.
Further information is available from:
Karen Barton (k.barton@bolton.ac.uk)
Bolton Institute
Chadwick Street
Bolton, BL2 1JW
England